Michael Kator Cases

  1. DAVIS v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF THE TREASURY, No. 87-1020, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 489 U.S. 803; 109 S. Ct. 1500; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1667; 103 L. Ed. 2d 891; 57 U.S.L.W. 4389; 89-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9456; 63 A.F.T.R.2d (P-H) 1174; 10 E.B.C. 2097, January 9, 1989, Argued, March 28, 1989, Decided
  2. UNITED STATES DOJ v. REPORTERS COMM. FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, No. 87-1379, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 489 U.S. 749; 109 S. Ct. 1468; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1574; 103 L. Ed. 2d 774; 57 U.S.L.W. 4373; 16 Media L. Rep. 1545, December 7, 1988, Argued, March 22, 1989, Decided
  3. SHERIDAN v. United States, No. 87-626, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 487 U.S. 392; 108 S. Ct. 2449; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2873; 101 L. Ed. 2d 352; 56 U.S.L.W. 4761, April 26, 1988, Argued, June 24, 1988, Decided
  4. Peralta v. Heights Med. Ctr., Inc., No. 86-1430, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 485 U.S. 80; 108 S. Ct. 896; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 944; 99 L. Ed. 2d 75; 56 U.S.L.W. 4189, November 30, 1987, Argued, February 24, 1988, Decided
  5. UNITED STATES v. FAUSTO, No. 86-595, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 484 U.S. 439; 108 S. Ct. 668; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 574; 98 L. Ed. 2d 830; 56 U.S.L.W. 4128, Argued October 7, 1987, January 25, 1988
  6. CORNELIUS v. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC. FUND, INC., No. 84-312, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 473 U.S. 788; 105 S. Ct. 3439; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 133; 87 L. Ed. 2d 567; 53 U.S.L.W. 5116, February 19, 1985, Argued, July 2, 1985, Decided
  7. LINDAHL v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MGMT., No. 83-5954, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 470 U.S. 768; 105 S. Ct. 1620; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 77; 84 L. Ed. 2d 674; 53 U.S.L.W. 4371, December 3, 1984, Argued, March 20, 1985, Decided
  8. WILSON v. PENA, No. 94-5273, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 79 F.3d 154; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 5129; 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P44,005; 316 U.S. App. D.C. 352, November 3, 1995, Argued, March 22, 1996, Decided
  9. CASTLE v. RUBIN, No. 95-5087, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 78 F.3d 654; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4492; 316 U.S. App. D.C. 293, March 15, 1996, Filed
  10. DIAMOND v. ATWOOD, Nos. 93-5235, 93-5246, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 43 F.3d 1538; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1067; 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1249; 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P43,447; 310 U.S. App. D.C. 113, October 20, 1994, Argued, January 20, 1995, Decided
  11. Barth v. Gelb, No. 91-5199, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 2 F.3d 1180; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21668; 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42,659; 303 U.S. App. D.C. 211, November 2, 1992, Argued, August 27, 1993, Decided
  12. BURKEY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLES. HOSP. ASSN., No. 91-3653., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, 983 F.2d 656; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2320; 16 E.B.C. 1682, February 17, 1993, Decided, As Corrected.
  13. SHERIDAN v. UNITED STATES, No. 91-1865, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 969 F.2d 72; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16315, May 4, 1992, Argued, July 8, 1992, Decided
  14. HONG-YEE CHIU v. UNITED STATES, No. 90-5044, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 948 F.2d 711; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25427, October 29, 1991, Decided, As Corrected November 22, 1991.
  15. PROUD v. STONE, No. 90-2443, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 945 F.2d 796; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22252; 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 301; 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40,979, July 10, 1991, Argued, September 23, 1991, Decided
  16. OLSON v. MOBIL OIL CORP., No. 89-2349, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 904 F.2d 198; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8234; 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1543; 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P39,926, January 9, 1990, Argued, May 21, 1990, Decided, Rehearing Denied June 27, 1990, Reported at 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12361.
  17. HARRIS v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MGMT., No. 89-3147, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 888 F.2d 121; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15599, October 13, 1989, Decided
  18. NATIONAL ASSN. OF RETIRED FED. EMPLES. v. HORNER, No. 86-5446, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 879 F.2d 873; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9773; 279 U.S. App. D.C. 27, April 4, 1987, Argued, July 7, 1989, Decided
  19. PROUD v. UNITED STATES, No. 88-5162, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 872 F.2d 1066; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5403; 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1011; 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P38,930; 277 U.S. App. D.C. 96, February 13, 1989, Argued, April 21, 1989, Decided
  20. FINN v. UNITED STATES, No. 87-3039, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 856 F.2d 606; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12139, June 8, 1988, Argued September 6, 1988, Decided, As amended.
  21. Bryant v. Weinberger, No. 87-3584 RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 838 F.2d 465; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 447, January 20, 1988, Decided
  22. Ireland v. Shultz, No. 86-5355, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 829 F.2d 1189; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13087; 265 U.S. App. D.C. 57, September 10, 1987, Argued, October 2, 1987, Decided
  23. Light v. Wolf, No. 85-5903, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 816 F.2d 746; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5055; 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 871; 259 U.S. App. D.C. 442, September 25, 1986, Argued, April 17, 1987, Decided
  24. DUNNING v. NASA, No. 82-1259, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 718 F.2d 1170; 231 U.S. App. D.C. 132, December 3, 1982, Argued, October 11, 1983, Decided
  25. TURNER v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MGMT., No. 82-1436, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT, 707 F.2d 1499; 228 U.S. App. D.C. 94, January 19, 1983, Argued, May 17, 1983
  26. CASTLE v. BENTSEN, Civil No. 93-2643 (CRR), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 872 F. Supp. 1062; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 873, January 20, 1995, Decided, January 23, 1995, FILED
  27. CASTLE v. BENTSEN, Civil No. 93-2643 (CRR), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 872 F. Supp. 1055; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 700, January 18, 1995, Decided, January 18, 1995, FILED
  28. FOX v. COMMISSIONER, C.A. No. 93-2019 (WBB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19196; 75 A.F.T.R.2d (P-H) 642, December 20, 1994, Decided, December 20, 1994, FILED
  29. CASTLE v. BENTSEN, Civil No. 93-2643 (CRR), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 867 F. Supp. 4; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16133, November 8, 1994, Decided, November 8, 1994, Filed
  30. DIAMOND v. ROSKENS, Civil Action No. 91-1510 (TPJ), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 790 F. Supp. 350; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7005; 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1312, May 13, 1992, Decided, May 13,1992, Filed
  31. NATIONAL ASSN. OF RETIRED FED. EMPLES. v. HORNER, Civil Action No. 85-4021, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 633 F. Supp. 511; 7 E.B.C. 1460, April 17, 1986
  32. WIGLER v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYS. CORP., Civil No. R 85-666, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 108 F.R.D. 204, November 21, 1985, Filed
  33. CONNOR v. HODEL, No. 83-1694, United States District Court, District of Columbia, 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 362, May 16, 1984
  34. SOBLE v. UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, Civil Action No. M-83-290, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 572 F. Supp. 1509; 33 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 611, October 13, 1983
  35. VELASQUEZ v. FAURER, Civil No. K-82-1780, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, 101 F.R.D. 8; 38 Fed. R. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 1123; 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1094; 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1094, August 29, 1983
  36. TURVENE v. UNITED STATES, No. 86-87C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT, 14 Cl. Ct. 227; 1988 U.S. Cl. Ct. LEXIS 12, February 3, 1988
  37. IRELAND v. UNITED STATES, No. 602-86C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT, 11 Cl. Ct. 543; 1987 U.S. Cl. Ct. LEXIS 25, February 12, 1987
  38. SANTORA v. UNITED STATES, No. 92-85C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT, 10 Cl. Ct. 38, May 16, 1986
  39. REICH v. COLLINS, Nos. S92A0621, S92A0622, Supreme Court of Georgia, 263 Ga. 602; 437 S.E.2d 320; 1993 Ga. LEXIS 817; 93 Fulton County DR P4325; 17 E.B.C. 2001, December 2, 1993, Decided
  40. MARX v. BROOM, No. 91-CC-00476, CONSOLIDATED WITH: 91-CC-00474, CONSOLIDATED WITH: 91-CC-00475, CONSOLIDATED WITH 91-CC-00422, SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI, 632 So. 2d 1315; 1994 Miss. LEXIS 117; 18 E.B.C. 1054, February 24, 1994,Decided
  41. HAMACHER v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, No. 71870, Supreme Court of Missouri, 779 S.W.2d 565; 1989 Mo. LEXIS 107, November 14, 1989
  42. HACKMAN v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, No. 71628, Supreme Court of Missouri, 771 S.W.2d 77; 1989 Mo. LEXIS 58; 11 E.B.C. 1014, May 25, 1989, Filed
  43. STRELECKI v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMN., No. 77,615, SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA, 872 P.2d 910; 1993 Okla. LEXIS 143; 64 O.B.A.J. 2885, September 28, 1993, Filed, Rehearing Granted March 17, 1994 and Corrected Order of Clarification, March 23, 1994, Reported at: 1994 Okla. LEXIS 39.
  44. HARPER v. VIRGINIA DEPT. OF TAXATION, Record No. 940326, Record No. 940411, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, 250 Va. 184; 462 S.E.2d 892; 1995 Va. LEXIS 99; 12 VLR 185; 19 E.B.C. 1873, September 15, 1995, Decided
Message us For a Free Consultation

    Call For a Free Consultation
    Phone Image (202) 898-4800
    © 2024 Kator, Parks, Weiser & Wright, PLLC